VibeSenseAI Observability & Intelligence · by VibeSea

Make your output 10× by using AI.

See who in your company is at 1× and who is at 10× with AI — in every role — with quality held and the cost per unit of work signed by finance. Then move everyone up.

Claim a design-partner seat See the screens

Read-only in a day · nothing installed · your number every day · the close signed every month

What you see every day and every month, and improve on, toward 10× — four numbers, one index · 1× to 10×
OFF VIBESENSE ON
1 · Company multiplier · the ladder — CEO
1.4× · nobody knows
median across every role, 1× to 10× · updates every day · grey = works alone · blue = assisted · purple = operator → orchestrator
2 · People at 3× or above — leadership
11% · 2 people per team
the share of the company past the operator rung · by department, ranked every day · the playbook moves it
3 · Cost per unit of work — CFO
AI bill · unowned
people cost + AI spend per finished unit vs the pre-AI baseline · per department · tracked daily · signed monthly
4 · Quality held — everyone
not measured
work that came back — reopened, reverted, corrected, denied — vs each role's bar · checked every day · a multiplier only counts when this holds
VibeSense off · AI adoption measured by seats and logins · productivity by anecdote · nobody knows who is at 10×» sourced · ◌ our estimate

Flip the switch · directional ◌ — live every day on your own index from week one

What VibeSense is

One number per person, team and department: how much more they finish with AI than the role did before it.

Read from the systems you already run — GitHub, Zendesk, Salesforce, NetSuite — never a survey. It only counts when quality held. Engineering, support, sales, finance, legal, marketing, healthcare.

What you get
  • Your number, every day — each person sees their own multiplier and next step first, in Slack, Teams or email
  • The enterprise ranked — departments, teams and roles on one 1×–10× ladder, live every day
  • The 10× playbook per role — what your top people do, as everyone's next step
  • The signed close, every month — cost per unit of work, per department, reconciled to the invoice
See your department's screen →EngineeringSupportSalesFinanceLegalMarketingHealthcare
The question every CEO is now asked — and cannot answer from any screen they have

"We gave everyone AI. Who actually got faster, by how much, at what quality — and what did a unit of work cost us?"

Every vendor sells a seat and reports a login. Every department has a story. Nobody has one number per person, in every role, that says how much more work got finished — and whether it was any good. So the board hears "adoption is 80%" and the CFO sees a bill that grows every month.

What the CEO sees today

Adoption, not output

Seats bought, seats active, prompts per day, a survey that says people "feel more productive". Eight tools, eight dashboards, none of them about finished work.

Missing: a multiplier per person and per department, with quality held, that the company can be ranked on.
What the CFO sees today

A bill that moves

Seats plus consumption, across a dozen vendors, allocated by department weeks after the fact, with no link to what was produced.

Missing: the cost per finished unit of work, by department, month over month — signed.
What the department head sees today

Two people at 10×, forty at 1×

Everyone knows who the AI-native people are. Nobody knows what they do differently, or how to move the other forty.

Missing: the playbook — what the 10× people in this role actually do — delivered to the 1× people as their next step.
The number VibeSense produces for every person — and why no tool you run today can
multiplier=finished units of work this month÷the role's pre-AI baseline·only if quality held·at a cost per unit

Simple on paper. In practice it needs three answers that live in three different places:

1 · What counts as finished?A merged PR, a resolved ticket, a closed deal, a posted invoice, an executed contract, a clean claim — read from the system that records it. Never self-reported, never a survey.
2 · Was it good?Not reverted, not reopened, not corrected, not denied, not churned — read from the same systems, 30 days later. A multiplier only counts with quality held.
3 · What did it cost?The person's loaded time plus the AI spend they used, per finished unit — so a 5× person who burns 20× the tokens shows up as what they are.
44.7%

of leaders do not measure AI impact at all — while 88% of teams use AI daily or weekly » LinearB

+34% / +54%

tasks per developer up — and bugs per developer up more. Speed without quality is not a multiplier » Faros AI

10× vs 1×

the spread between the most and least AI-fluent people in the same role, same company ◌ — the largest unmanaged gap in the business

0

enterprises with one multiplier per person across every role, quality held, cost attached, signed by finance ◌

What an adoption dashboard does

  • Counts seats and logins — never what got finished
  • Reports productivity from a survey, so everyone is "more productive"
  • Treats the 10× person and the 1× person as two active seats
  • Grows the bill with no number to defend it

What the AI Multiplier Index does

  • Puts one multiplier on every person, team and department, from finished work
  • Counts it only when quality held — reverts, reopens, denials, churn
  • Ranks the enterprise, then hands every 1× person the 10× playbook for their role
  • Prices every finished unit — people + AI — and signs it monthly
Why this week, not next quarter

Starting costs you an hour. Waiting costs you another planning cycle defended with an adoption chart.

Day 1Nothing changes

Read-only access to two systems of record — say GitHub + Jira, or Zendesk — and the admin analytics your AI tools already expose. Nothing on anyone's laptop.

Week 1You see your whole company on the ladder

Every department's multiplier, the seats producing nothing extra, the 10× people in each role. Free. Yours to keep.

Week 4A number your finance lead signs

Cost per unit of work on one department, quality held, under a method agreed on one page first. Also yours to keep.

Day 90The bar is in the contract

The first department's median up a rung with quality held — or the pilot fee is waived and we publish why.

What you riskAn hour. No credit card, no commitment until the pilot agreement, pricing locked for three years if you continue, and every tool you run today still runs tomorrow.
The ladder — four rungs, the same in every role

1× to 10× is not a slogan. It is four ways of working, and we can see which one each person is in.

The multiplier is measured from finished work. The rung is read from how the person works with AI — how much they delegate, how much they verify, how many agents they run. The rung predicts the multiplier, which is why it can be taught.

1×
Works alone

Does the work by hand. AI is open in another tab. The baseline the role had before AI.

Support agent · 38 tickets / week
Engineer · 16 merged PRs / mo
AP analyst · 420 invoices / mo
2×
Assisted

AI drafts, the person finishes. Faster first drafts, same review load, same queue.

Support · 74 tickets · reopen held
Engineer · 31 PRs · review wait grows
AP · 800 invoices · 2% corrections
4×
Operator

The person directs agents, reviews their output in batches and keeps the quality bar. Most of the company can get here in a quarter.

Support · 150 tickets · 2 agents
Engineer · 61 PRs · 2 agents
AP · 1,700 invoices · exceptions only
10×
Orchestrator

Runs a fleet. Reviews exceptions. Writes the playbook the rest of the role copies. The person the company is ranked around.

Support · 380 tickets · 6 agents · reopen 5%
Engineer · 160 PRs · 5 agents · revert 1%
AP · 4,200 invoices · 0.4% corrections
Plain wordsA 10× person is not working ten times harder. They have changed what the job is — from doing the work to directing and checking it. VibeSense finds those people in every role, measures them from finished work, and turns what they do into the next step for everyone else.
One person, today — any role, placed on the ladder what the index stamps on it
Person · role · this month so far backend engineer · platform team 61 merged PRs · 2 agents run · review in batches operator rung
Multiplier3.8×vs role baseline 16 PRs/mo · p91 in role
QualityHELD · revert 1.1%bar 3% · debt $0 · no incident
Cost per unit$41 / PRwas $142 · people + AI, all in
Recorded · the person sees it first · rolls up to team, department, company

Four sample people · simulated for illustration ◌ — your index runs on your own systems

"Every AI vendor tells you how many seats are active. We tell you which of your people finished three times the work with the quality held — in every department — what each finished unit cost, and what to tell everyone else on Monday."

finished work · quality held · cost per unit · the playbook — seen every day · signed by finance every month

Every role — one index, eight branches

The same number in every department. Because every role already has a finished unit of work in a system you run.

The index is the same everywhere: finished units ÷ baseline, quality held, cost attached. What changes per branch is which system we read and what "finished" means. Software Intelligence is the first branch and the deepest — the one with agents writing a quarter of the work already.

Branch 1 · deepest · live first
Software Intelligence
Unit: merged PR · closed ticket · resolved incident
Read from: GitHub, GitLab, Jira, Linear, CI, PagerDuty + Copilot, Cursor, Claude Code
10× LOOKS LIKE runs 5 coding agents, reviews in batches, revert ≤1%, $41 per merged PR against $142 — the branch in depth →
Branch 2
Customer Support
Unit: ticket resolved, not reopened in 7 days
Read from: Zendesk, ServiceNow, Intercom, Freshdesk
10× LOOKS LIKE 380 tickets/week through 6 agents, reopen ≤5%, CSAT held, $1.20 per ticket
Branch 3
Sales & SDR
Unit: qualified meeting held · opportunity closed-won
Read from: Salesforce, HubSpot, Gong, Outreach
10× LOOKS LIKE 9× the qualified meetings with show-rate held and no spam complaints — pipeline that converts, not emails sent
Branch 4
Finance & Accounts Payable
Unit: invoice posted without correction · reconciliation closed
Read from: NetSuite, SAP, Workday, Coupa, Bill.com
10× LOOKS LIKE 4,200 invoices/month, 0.4% corrections, exceptions only, close in 3 days
Branch 5
Legal & Contracts
Unit: contract reviewed and executed · matter closed
Read from: Ironclad, DocuSign, CLM, iManage
10× LOOKS LIKE 7× the NDAs and MSAs turned, redlines accepted first time, zero escalations to outside counsel
Branch 6
Marketing & Content
Unit: asset published · campaign shipped · pipeline attributed
Read from: HubSpot, Marketo, CMS, ad platforms
10× LOOKS LIKE 12× the published assets with engagement and pipeline per asset held — not volume for its own sake
Branch 7
Recruiting & People
Unit: candidate screened · offer accepted · onboarding done
Read from: Greenhouse, Lever, Workday, Ashby
10× LOOKS LIKE screens 8× the candidates with pass-through and 90-day retention held
Branch 8
Healthcare Revenue Cycle
Unit: clean claim submitted · denial resolved · prior auth obtained
Read from: Epic, Cerner, Waystar, Availity
10× LOOKS LIKE 6× the claims per coder with first-pass acceptance held above 96%
Why this worksEvery one of these roles has a system of record that already says "finished" and already says "it came back". VibeSense reads that, never a self-report. Operations, procurement, claims, underwriting and clinical documentation follow the same pattern — a branch ships whenever a system of record exists.
Three Mondays — what actually changes for the people who use it

Same company, same tools, same people. One record underneath.

The VP of Support · Monday 9:00

"Who is actually good at this, and why?"

TodayOpens Zendesk, sees ticket counts. Opens the AI vendor's console, sees seats and prompts. Guesses that EMEA is better because the team lead says so.

With VibeSenseOpens the ranking: EMEA at 4.2×, Billing held at 1.5× because reopens crossed the bar. The five things EMEA's top agents do are already the next steps on every APAC agent's screen. One decision: approve playbook v4.
The CFO · month-end

"Why did the AI line grow 30% and what did we get?"

TodayEleven invoices, allocated by headcount, defended with an adoption slide. The board asks for ROI; finance has a bill and a feeling.

With VibeSenseOpens the close: $418K of AI spend, 84% in departments above 2×, 744 seats producing nothing extra (named), cost per unit −38%, quality held in 7 of 8. Signs it. Posts eight lines to NetSuite.
An engineer · Monday 9:00

"Is any of this measuring me?"

TodaySuspects the new AI dashboard is a leaderboard. Hears nothing about what the fast people on the team do differently. Review queue is three days deep.

With VibeSenseOpens their own view first: 2.6×, p72 in role, quality held, cost per PR $58. Three steps from the 9× engineers — run the deps agent, batch review at 10 and 15, cap batches at 30. Nobody else sees the line unless they choose.
The screens — the ranking dashboard, the person view, and one screen per branch

Eleven screens. Every person's own number every day, the enterprise ranked, and the month closed on both.

Simulated for a 2,400-person company ◌ — engineering, support, sales, finance, legal, marketing and a revenue-cycle team. Your own data replaces every figure from week one.

vibesense://index · acme-group · 2,400 people · 8 departments · period Oct 2026 Prototype · simulated ◌
The index Branches Monthly

Enterprise ranking — every department, team and role on one ladderlive every day · signed at month-end · multiplier from finished work · quality held · cost per unit attached

Company median multiplier
2.1×
was 1.4× at the X-Ray · +0.7 in 6 months
People above 3× (operator)
23%
552 of 2,400 · was 11%
Still at 1× with AI seats
31%
744 people · $31K/mo in seats producing nothing extra
Cost per unit of work · company
−38%
vs pre-AI baseline · quality held in 7 of 8 depts
#DepartmentPeopleMedianTop decile≥3×QualityCost / unitTrend
1Engineering6123.1×9.8×41%revert 1.9%−61%▲ +0.4
2Customer Support4802.8×9.1×36%reopen 6.2%−57%▲ +0.6
3Finance & AP962.6×10.1×29%corrections 0.9%−54%▲ +0.3
4Marketing1402.2×11.4×22%engagement −4%−41%▲ +0.2
5Legal381.9×6.8×16%escalations 0−33%▲ +0.2
6Recruiting441.8×7.2×14%90-day retention held−29%▲ +0.1
7Sales & SDR3201.4×8.9×9%show-rate −11%+6%▼ −0.1
8Revenue Cycle (clinic)721.2×5.6×6%first-pass 96.4%−8%— new
#TeamDeptPeopleMedian≥3×QualityCost / unitTrend
1Tier-1 Support · EMEASupport624.2×58%reopen 5.1%−68%▲ +0.9
2Backend PlatformEngineering483.9×54%revert 1.1%−71%▲ +0.5
3Accounts Payable · USFinance313.5×45%corrections 0.6%−62%▲ +0.4
4MobileEngineering362.9×39%revert 2.4%−55%▲ +0.3
5Content StudioMarketing222.5×27%engagement −6%−44%▲ +0.2
…74 teams ranked · full list in the app
73Enterprise SDR · WestSales281.1×4%show-rate −18%+14%▼ −0.2
74Coding · OutpatientRev Cycle191.0×0%first-pass 97%0%— new
#RolePeopleBaseline (1×)MedianTop decileGap 10×/medianPlaybook
1AP analyst68420 invoices / mo2.9×10.1×3.5×v3 · 4 steps
2Support agent · tier 136038 tickets / wk2.8×9.1×3.3×v4 · 5 steps
3Backend engineer29016 merged PRs / mo3.0×9.8×3.3×v5 · 6 steps
4Content marketer526 assets / mo2.3×11.4×5.0×v2 · in review
5Contracts counsel2214 contracts / mo1.9×6.8×3.6×v2 · 3 steps
6SDR24011 qualified meetings / mo1.3×8.9×6.8×v1 · quality gate first
7Medical coder41310 claims / mo1.1×5.6×5.1×drafting
Where the company sits on the ladder · 2,400 people
744
372
421
308
211
146
89
57
32
20
1×1.5×2×2.5×3×4×5×6×8×10×
Biggest movers this monthSupport EMEA +0.9 · AP US +0.4
Biggest gap to closeSDR · 6.8× between the top and the median
Quality warningSales · show-rate falling with volume
Seats producing nothing extra744 · $31K / mo
Equivalent capacity unlocked+2,640 person-months ◌

Rankings are by department, team and role. Individuals are ranked only where the company's policy allows it — and every person sees their own number before anyone else does. The gap column is the product: the distance between the 10× people and the median is what the playbook closes.

The person view — your own number every day, and your next stepwhat every employee opens each morning · private by default · shared when they choose

tier-1 support · EMEA
Your multiplier · today · October so far
2.6× · p72 in your role

99 tickets resolved against a role baseline of 38 · reopen 5.8% (bar 8%) · CSAT 4.6 held · cost per ticket $2.10, was $6.40.

Rung: Assisted → Operator. You draft with AI on 91% of tickets and run one agent on refunds. The people at 9× in your role run four.

Yesterday2.5×
Last month2.1×
Team median4.2×
Role top decile9.1×
Visible toyou · your lead (you chose)
Your next three steps · from what 9× agents in your role do
1Let the triage agent route your queue · you review the summary, not each ticket · the 9× people do this on 100% of tickets+0.8× ◌
2Run the order-status and refund agents together · approve in one batch at 10:00 and 15:00+0.6× ◌
3Keep the quality bar · your reopen rate rises when you batch over 40 · cap batches at 30 until it holdsbar held
What it would mean
If you take steps 1–2 next month≈ 4.0× ◌
Cost per ticket at that rung≈ $1.40
Hours you get back per week≈ 9 h ◌

The person sees this every day, before their manager does, and chooses who else sees it. The index never says "work harder" — it says what the people at the top of your role do differently, and what it would be worth to you.

The 10× playbook — per role, learned from the top decile, delivered as a daily next stepsupport agent · tier 1 · v4 · approved by the head of support · new version monthly

5 steps · 360 people
Top decile · what they share
5 habits
present in 94% of 9×+ agents · absent in 81% of 1× agents
People on the playbook
212 / 360
started in the last 8 weeks
Lift after 8 weeks
+1.1×
median 1.9× → 3.0× · reopen held
Steps rolled back
1
"batch over 40" raised reopen rate · withdrawn
StepWhat the 10× people doShare of top decileShare of 1× peopleLift when adoptedQuality effectStatus
1Let the triage agent route and summarise every ticket; review the summary, not the thread100%12%+0.8×reopen unchangedLIVE · 212 people
2Run order-status and refund agents in parallel; approve in two batches a day96%6%+0.6×reopen +0.4 pts · within barLIVE
3Write the answer once as a macro the agent reuses; never retype91%22%+0.3×CSAT +0.1LIVE
4Escalate by exception: only tickets the agent marks uncertain88%9%+0.4×reopen −0.3 ptsROLLING OUT · 80 people
5Cap batches at 30 tickets———keeps reopen under 8%GUARDRAIL · from the rollback

The playbook is not written by us. It is read from what the top of each role already does and proven on the people who adopt it — with the quality effect measured, and any step that hurts quality withdrawn. One playbook per role, per company; versioned, approved by the department head.

Software Intelligence — engineers and coding agents on one ladderbackend platform · 48 people · 5 agents · unit: merged PR, no revert in 14 days

branch 1 · live
Team median multiplier
3.9×
16 → 62 merged PRs per engineer-month
Cost per merged PR · all in
$41
tokens + author + review + rework · was $142
PRs opened by agents
27%
5 agents · 5 owners · 2 earned auto-merge
Quality debt · priced
$31K
duplication, churn, rework · −22% this month
Who / whatRungMerged PRs / moMultiplierAgents runRevert · debtCost / PRNext step
Top decile (5 engineers)Orchestrator1609.8×51.0% · $0.4K$19writes the playbook
Team medianOperator623.9×21.1% · $0.6K$41step 3 · batch review
Bottom quartile (12 engineers)Assisted291.8×02.6% · $2.1K$88step 1 · run the deps agent
claude-code cloud #a7 · agentowner J. Ortiz412 runs——1.2% · 0 incidents$2.10 / run1 in 10 reviewed
codex-deps · agentowner R. Patel318 runs——0.3% · 0$0.60 / runauto-merge · earned
devin · trial · agentowner S. Okafor40 runs——4.8% · 1 incident$18.40 / runreview every · trial ends Nov

The deepest branch: the agents are on the same ladder as the people, with an owner, a cost per run and a review level earned on their own record — and every merged PR carries its priced debt. Individual engineers appear as deciles here; each engineer's own line is in their person view. What else this branch carries →

Customer Support — the ladder for 480 agents across three regionsunit: ticket resolved, not reopened in 7 days · read from Zendesk

branch 2
Dept median multiplier
2.8×
38 → 106 tickets per agent-week
Cost per resolved ticket
$2.70
people + AI · was $6.40
Quality · reopen rate
6.2%
bar 8% · CSAT 4.5 held
Agents still at 1×
118
25% · all with seats · playbook step 1 assigned
TeamPeopleMedian≥3×Tickets / agent-wkReopenCSATCost / ticketPlaybook adoption
Tier 1 · EMEA624.2×58%1605.1%4.6$1.7092%
Tier 1 · US1403.0×39%1146.4%4.5$2.4071%
Tier 1 · APAC962.2×21%846.9%4.4$3.3044%
Tier 2 · technical1102.0×18%527.1%4.6$9.8058%
Billing721.5×8%579.4%4.2$5.1022% · quality gate first

Billing is the warning: volume rose, reopen rate crossed the bar, so its multiplier is held at 1.5× until quality recovers — the index never rewards speed that comes back. EMEA wrote the playbook; APAC is adopting it.

Sales & SDR — the branch where volume liesunit: qualified meeting held · opportunity closed-won · read from Salesforce and Gong

branch 3
Dept median multiplier
1.4×
emails ×9 · qualified meetings ×1.4
Quality · show-rate
−11%
meetings booked by AI sequences no-show more
Top decile
8.9×
24 SDRs · show-rate held · zero spam complaints
Cost per qualified meeting
$212
was $240 · would be $140 at the top-decile pattern
TeamPeopleEmails / SDR-wkQualified meetings / moMultiplierShow-rateSpam complaintsCost / meetingVerdict
Mid-market · East40620312.8×71%0$150top-decile pattern
Enterprise · West281,900121.1×52%14$410volume without quality · held
SMB · inbound60310442.2×78%1$96operator rung
Enterprise · East321,400141.3×58%6$360quality gate first

Sales is where every AI-productivity dashboard gets fooled: 9× the emails is not 9× the pipeline. The index counts the meeting that was held and the deal that closed, discounts the no-shows, and flags the team whose "multiplier" is a spam problem.

Finance & Accounts Payable — the cleanest multiplier in the companyunit: invoice posted without correction · reconciliation closed · read from NetSuite and Coupa

branch 4
Dept median multiplier
2.6×
420 → 1,090 invoices per analyst-month
Top decile
10.1×
4,200 invoices · exceptions only · 0.4% corrections
Cost per invoice posted
$1.90
people + AI · was $4.10
Days to close
4
was 7 · reconciliations agent-prepared, analyst-signed
TeamPeopleInvoices / analyst-moMultiplierCorrectionsDuplicate payments caughtCost / invoiceRung
AP · US311,4703.5×0.6%41 · $218K$1.40Operator
AP · EMEA241,0502.5×0.9%18 · $64K$2.10Assisted → Operator
Expense & T&E13— (reports)3.1×1.1%—$0.80 / reportOperator
GL & close28— (reconciliations)2.0×0.3%—$31 / recAssisted

Finance is the branch finance people trust first, because the unit is unambiguous and the correction is already logged. The CFO's own department is ranked on the same index the CFO signs — which is why the close screen exists.

Marketing & Content — the branch where output must be tied to outcomeunit: asset published · campaign shipped · pipeline attributed · read from HubSpot and the CMS

branch 6
Dept median multiplier
2.2×
6 → 13 published assets per marketer-month
Top decile
11.4×
the widest spread in the company
Quality · engagement per asset
−4%
within bar (−10%) · watched
Pipeline per asset
held
$8.1K · was $8.4K · cost per asset $310, was $1,140
TeamPeopleAssets / moMultiplierEngagement / assetPipeline / assetCost / assetVerdict
Content studio22582.5×−6%held$290operator · watch engagement
Demand gen31112 (campaign variants)3.3×+2%+9%$140top-decile pattern
Product marketing18211.8×+1%held$680assisted
Social9540 posts1.5×−19%−22%$9 / postvolume without quality · held

Marketing is where "10× more content" most often means 10× more noise. The index counts the asset only with its engagement and pipeline beside it — social is held at 1.5× until its numbers recover, demand gen earns 3.3× because its pipeline per variant went up.

Healthcare Revenue Cycle — coders, billers and prior-auth on one ladderunit: clean claim submitted · denial resolved · prior auth obtained · read from Epic and Waystar

branch 8 · new
Dept median multiplier
1.2×
310 → 370 claims per coder-month · month 2
Top decile
5.6×
3 coders · AI-coded, coder-verified · first-pass 97%
First-pass acceptance
96.4%
bar 95% · held
Cost per clean claim
$6.10
was $6.80 · would be $2.40 at the top-decile pattern
TeamPeopleUnits / person-moMultiplierFirst-passDenials overturnedDays in A/RCost / unitRung
Coding · inpatient22390 claims1.3×96.8%—41$6.40Assisted
Coding · outpatient19310 claims1.0×97.0%—38$6.80Works alone
Denials17140 denials2.0×—61%−6$18Operator
Prior auth14260 auths2.4×——−9$11Operator

In healthcare the quality bar is regulatory: a claim counts only when it is accepted first pass, and a coder's multiplier never rises on claims that come back. Denials and prior auth are where the operator rung arrives first; coding follows once the playbook from the three 5.6× coders is approved by compliance.

The monthly close — the AI line of the company, by department, signedOctober 2026 · maker/checker · e-signature · journal entries

accrual basis
Period summary · acme-group · 2,400 people
AI spend · seats + consumption · 11 vendors$418,600
of which in departments at median ≥ 2×$352,100 · 84%
of which on seats producing nothing extra (1×)$31,200 · 744 people
Finished units · all branches · quality held412,800
Company median multiplier2.1× (Sep: 1.9×)
Equivalent capacity unlocked ◌2,640 person-months · ≈ $23.8M / yr
Cost per unit of work vs pre-AI baseline−38% · quality held in 7 of 8 depts
Departments held for qualitySales · show-rate
AI spend vs vendor invoicesvariance −$2,140 · credits explained
Journal entriesNetSuite · 8 dept lines · posted
VibeSense · Monthly CloseOCT 2026
Scope8 departments · 2,400 people
Company multiplier2.1× (Sep: 1.9×)
People ≥ 3×552 · 23%
Cost / unit vs baseline−38%
Quality holdsSales · 1 of 8
Methodv2 · frozen for the period
MakerA. Chen · FP&A · Oct 31
CheckerM. Kim · Controller · Nov 2
Period hashb41c…9e07
SIGNED

Every figure replays from raw events under the frozen method. The CEO's multiplier, the department head's ranking and the CFO's cost per unit are the same numbers on the same page — which is what lets one close carry all three.

Want the ranking on your company by week four? Claim a seat.

Eight seats. You give us read-only access to two systems of record and a named finance owner; we give you the X-Ray — every department's multiplier, every person's own number, the 10× playbook for your first role — and a signed cost per unit of work on one department in four weeks, yours to keep whether or not you continue. Pricing locked for three years. The day-90 bar is in the contract.

Claim a design-partner seat3 of 8 seats open · X-Ray and signed number free · pilot only after you see the number
Software Intelligence — the first branch, and the one nobody else has built this far

Engineering is where agents already do a quarter of the work. So this is where the index goes deepest.

Every engineering-metrics tool on the market counts what humans did in Git and correlates it with AI seats. VibeSense puts engineers and coding agents on one ladder, prices every merged PR all-in, and acts on it. Eight things you get in this branch that you cannot buy elsewhere:

1 · The numberCost per merged PR, all in

Tokens + author minutes + reviewer minutes + rework + incidents, per PR, per team, trended against the pre-AI baseline. Signed by finance.

nobody computes the human half
2 · The rosterEvery coding agent with an owner

Copilot agents, Cursor cloud agents, Claude Code, Codex, Devin, your own: owner, scope, cost per run, merge rate, defect rate. Agents are workers with managers.

nobody keeps the roster
3 · Earned autonomyReview levels the agent earns

Review-every → 1-in-4 → 1-in-10 → auto-merge, per agent per task class, on its own merge and revert record. Withdrawn the moment quality drifts. A CTO can sign it.

nobody lets autonomy be earned
4 · The debt ledgerQuality debt in dollars, flagged before merge

Duplication, churn, rework and incidents traced to the PR and the agent that wrote it, priced with your rates. A 40% throughput gain shows its liability beside it.

nobody prices it
5 · Review economicsAgent PRs routed where they earn it

Agent PRs wait 5× longer for review » — the 2027 bottleneck. Routed by reviewer load and expertise, batched when small, merged on their own when earned. Pushed to the tools you run.

the bottleneck, priced and routed
6 · The engineer playbookWhat the 10× engineers do, taught to the rest

Which agents they run, how they batch review, what they never hand to a model. Read from the top decile, proven on adopters, versioned. The bottom quartile's next step, every Monday.

nobody teaches it from the record
7 · Hire or multiplyHeadcount plans with agents as capacity

"Four engineers or forty agent-hours a month on tier-2 bugs?" — answered from your own cost per PR, defect rate and review capacity, not a vendor's claim.

planning across both kinds of worker
8 · Intelligence the agents useYour coding agents ask VibeSense before they work

Which model clears the bar in this repo, who can review today, what the budget and the debt threshold are — served to the agent before it opens a PR, and a receipt written after. The first intelligence platform agents depend on.

nobody serves the agent
Why engineering firstEngineering has the cleanest "finished" data (merged, reverted, incident), the earliest agent adoption and the most to lose in review queues. Every other branch inherits what engineering proves on your estate: the unit, the quality bar, the roster of agents, the playbook, the close.
Who it's for — four people, four numbers, one index

Each person gets the one number they are judged on. Same product, same record.

You are a fit if three things are true: 500 or more people in roles with a system of record (engineering, support, sales, finance, legal, marketing, recruiting, revenue cycle) · AI tools already bought for them · a finance lead who closes the month.

CEO · COO · Board
The company multiplier

One number for "did the AI budget work?"

WhoThe CEO who approved AI for everyone and gets adoption charts back
Valuethe median multiplier · departments ranked · the share above 3× · the capacity unlocked, in person-months and dollars
TicketPer person / month · published ◌
ProofX-Ray in week 1 → one department signed in week 4 → the company close in month 3
CFO · Controller · FP&A
Cost per unit of work — signed

The AI line of the P&L, by department, closed monthly

WhoThe finance owner paying eleven AI vendors with no number to defend the growth
ValueAI spend reconciled to invoices · cost per finished unit per department · seats producing nothing extra, named · the signed close posted to the ERP
TicketEconomics add-on inside the same contract ◌
Proofa method you signed first → a close you post
Department heads · VP Eng · VP Support · VP Sales
The ranking, every day — and the playbook

Move forty people from 1× to 3× in a quarter

WhoThe leader who knows who the AI-native people are and cannot clone them
Valueteams ranked with quality beside the multiplier · the 10× playbook for each role · every person's next step · quality holds before volume becomes a problem
TicketInside Core · per branch ◌
Proofmedian up a full rung in 8 weeks on the first role, quality held
CTO · CIO · Head of AI
Software Intelligence

Engineers and agents on one ladder, every PR priced

WhoThe technical leader with agents opening a quarter of the PRs and no roster
Valuecost per merged PR all in · the agent roster · earned autonomy · the priced debt · review routing · hire-or-multiply planning
TicketPer engineer + per agent ◌
Proofa signed cost per merged PR · the first agent earns auto-merge on record
One line eachCEO: "Company median went from 1.4× to 2.1× in six months and 552 people are above 3×. Sales is the problem and I know why." CFO: "AI spend is 84% in departments above 2×, 744 seats are producing nothing, and I signed the close." VP Support: "EMEA wrote the playbook, APAC adopted it, median up a rung." CTO: "Every agent has an owner, two earned auto-merge, and a merged PR costs $41."
Deliverables — things you can open, forward or sign, with a cadence

Nothing below is a dashboard you have to interpret. Every day for the person, every week for the department, every month signed.

Every day · per personThe person view

Your multiplier today and this month so far, quality held, and the next step from the 10× people in your role — in Slack, Teams or email, before anyone else sees it.

the daily habit that moves the median
Every week · department headsMovers and holds

Which teams moved up a rung this week, which were held for quality, and the seats still at 1× — one page, Monday morning.

what to act on this week
Week 1–4 · one-time · freeThe AI Multiplier X-Ray

Every department's multiplier from finished work, every person's own number, the seats producing nothing extra, the 10× people in each role — and today's cost per unit of work on one department. Yours to keep.

read-only · nothing changes
Week 2 · per branchThe method page

The unit, the system it is read from, the quality bar, the baseline, the cost sources and the ranking policy — on one page, signed by your maker and checker before anything is measured.

the page your auditor and your works council read
Monthly · per role · daily stepsThe 10× playbook

What the top decile of each role does differently, as the next three steps for everyone else — proven on adopters, with the quality effect measured, approved by the department head.

the thing that moves the median
Live daily · signed monthlyThe ranking

Departments, teams and roles on one ladder, with quality beside the multiplier, movers and holds called out, and the gap between the top and the median per role.

the CEO's page
Monthly · signedThe close

AI spend by department reconciled to invoices; finished units; cost per unit; capacity unlocked; seats producing nothing; e-signature and journal entries.

the AI line lands in the ledger
QuarterlyThe benchmark

Where your median and your top decile sit, per role, against companies of your size — anonymised, method published.

"is 2.1× good?"
Fair play — ranked to lift, never to punish

A multiplier is only useful if people trust it. So the rules are written for the person being measured.

The index ranks the enterprise because that is what moves it. It does not become a weapon, because five rules are built in and published on the method page every employee can read.

Rule 1The person sees it first

Every multiplier is shown to the person before anyone else, with what it is made of. They choose who else sees the individual line.

Rule 2The company is ranked by department, team and role

Individual rankings exist only where the company's written policy allows them — and never as the default.

Rule 3Quality first, always

No multiplier rises on work that came back. Volume without quality is held at the rung it earned — which protects the careful person from the fast one.

Rule 4Metadata only

We read events — finished, reopened, reverted, accepted. No documents, code, prompts or messages are stored.

Rule 5Every ranking comes with the playbook

The index never says "do better". It says what the people at the top of your role do, and what it is worth to you. The gap is a lesson, not a verdict.

And the agentsAgents carry the scrutiny

Cost per run, merge rate, defect rate and review level are tracked per agent — because an agent is a tool with a budget, and the people who run it deserve to know which ones are worth it.

Works councilsThe method page, the data posture and the ranking policy are written so that an EU works council can read them and sign. Individual rankings are off until a written policy turns them on, and the person is told.
Your first 90 days — read-only in a day, a signed number by week 10

Nothing changes on day one. You agree the method, we read your systems, the first role gets its playbook, and a finance lead signs the number.

Day 1 · Connect
Read-only access

Two systems of record to start — say GitHub + Jira, or Zendesk — plus the admin analytics your AI tools already expose. Nothing is installed on anyone's laptop.

You give: API tokens · ~1 hour
Week 1–2 · Agree
The X-Ray and the method page

We show every department's multiplier, the seats producing nothing, the 10× people in each role. Together we fix the unit, the quality bar, the baseline and the ranking policy for the first branch on one page.

You give: two meetings · a named finance owner · the ranking policy
Week 2–6 · Measure
The index fills · the playbook forms

Finished units joined to their quality outcome; baselines pre-registered; the first role's top decile read and its playbook drafted. Every person opens their own number first.

You give: one department · one department head
Week 6–10 · The number
Signed cost per unit of work

On one department, with its interval, the ranking of its teams and roles, and the first playbook approved and rolling out. The report is the sale.

You get: a number a finance owner signs · a department ranked · a playbook live
Day 90 · Verdict
Annual, or we publish why not

A signed number exists, and either the department median is up a rung with quality held or the whole company is ranked with every role's playbook drafted → annual.

You decide: renew · expand by branch · stop

The day-90 bar, in the contract. By day 90 a signed cost per unit of work exists on your first department, and either its median multiplier is up with quality held or the whole company is ranked on one ladder with the first playbook live → annual contract and a named case study. Below the bar — the pilot fee is waived and we publish that too. You keep the X-Ray and the method page either way.

Pricing — published, per person, by branch

Priced on the people we put a number on. No savings share. No counterfactual. No overage.

One thing we can both count: people on the index. Branches attach inside the same contract. If the median stops rising with quality held, you stop paying.

VibeSense · Index
$15 per person / mo
floor $30K / yr ◌

Every role with a system of record: the multiplier per person, team and department; quality held; the enterprise ranking; the person view; the 10× playbook per role; the method page; the monthly ranking and benchmark; exports to BI and FinOps.

Self-serve X-Ray: free to 100 people · $2K / mo to 500
Branch add-ons
Software Intelligence
+$25 / engineer + $50 / agent / mo ◌

Cost per merged PR all in, the agent roster, earned autonomy, the priced debt ledger, review routing, the engineer playbook, hire-or-multiply planning, the agent intelligence API. Economics add-on (cost per unit by department, the signed close, ERP posting) +$40–150K / yr ◌. Other branches: inside the Index price.

Agents replace seats — the agent line grows as they do
What is not in the price
Nothing hidden
  • No savings share — we never bill you on a number you could dispute
  • No individual ranking by default — policy-gated, the person told
  • No overage — more people moves you up a tier, nothing more
  • No lock-in — read-only mode, the X-Ray and the method page are yours to keep
Design partners: pricing locked for three years · pilot at $5K / mo
EstatePeople on the indexBranchesIndicative annual fee ◌What you sign by month 6 ◌
Growth500–2,0001–2$90–360Kone department signed · its median up a rung · first playbook live
Mid-market2,000–10,0003–5$360K–1.8Mthe company ranked · three playbooks · the close posted to the ERP
Enterprise10,000+any$1.8M+the AI line of the P&L · VPC or on-prem · benchmarks by division and country
Design partnersanyany$5K / mo pilot → annualthe X-Ray and the signed number free · pricing locked three years · the day-90 bar in writing
Why we do not sell a "with us vs without us" number

A counterfactual is a claim about a world that no longer exists — models change monthly, agents get better weekly, your teams change every quarter — and every renewal becomes a baseline debate. So the proof of value is your own index: the multiplier per department, month over month, quality held, cost per unit reconciled to the invoices you actually pay, under a method you signed before we measured.

Your number — what moving the median is worth to you

Put rough numbers on your company. Then see what one rung is worth.

Most companies discover the same thing: the gap between their median and their own top decile is worth more than any AI vendor's roadmap. A seat count cannot see that. The index can.

Your company
People in roles with a system of record2,400
Loaded cost per person-month$9,000
AI spend per person-month$175
Company median multiplier today1.4×
Target median (one rung up)2.5×
Share still at 1× with a paid seat31%
Capacity ◌ = people × median multiplier, in pre-AI person-months. Cost per unit ◌ = (loaded + AI spend) ÷ multiplier, relative to the pre-AI baseline. Your real numbers come from the X-Ray with the method agreed first; this is for the shape of it.
+2,640
Person-months of capacity unlocked per month at the target ◌
pre-AI baseline 2,400today +960at target +2,640
$285M / yr
What that capacity costs at loaded rates — the value of one rung ◌
−63%
Cost per unit of work vs pre-AI, at the target
$130K / mo
AI spend on seats producing nothing extra today

Get the real number — four weeks, read-only
Works with what you already run

Keep every tool you have. We read the systems that say "finished", and send the index back to them.

Systems of record · per branch
GitHub · GitLab · Jira · Linear · Zendesk · ServiceNow · Salesforce · HubSpot · NetSuite · SAP · Coupa · Ironclad · DocuSign · Greenhouse · Epic · Waystar

Finished units and their quality outcomes are read from here — never self-reported, never surveyed.

AI tools & agents
Copilot · Cursor · Claude Code · Codex · ChatGPT Enterprise · Claude for Work · Gemini · Microsoft 365 Copilot · Agentforce · your own agents

We read the admin analytics each one already exposes, so the rung is known per person. Nothing new on a laptop.

People & finance
Workday · SAP SuccessFactors · BambooHR · NetSuite · Oracle · Vantage · CloudZero

Roles and loaded rates join from HR; AI spend reconciles to invoices; the close posts to the ERP. Nothing changes for finance except that the number now exists.

Where people see it
Slack · Teams · email · Power BI · Snowflake · the VibeSense app

The daily person view, the playbook step and the ranking go where people already are. The index is an API your own tools — and your agents — can read.

The questions every buyer asks

Straight answers, before the call.

Can we start this week, and what does it cost us to try?
Yes. Day one is read-only — API tokens for two systems of record and your AI tools' admin analytics, about an hour of someone's time. Nothing is installed. The X-Ray and the signed cost per unit of work on one department are free and yours to keep; the paid pilot starts only after you have seen the number, at $5K a month, and converts to annual only if the day-90 bar in your contract is met. Three of eight design-partner seats are open.
What is "1× to 10×", exactly?
A multiplier: how many finished units of work a person completes in a month compared with what the role completed before AI — counted only when quality held (not reopened, reverted, corrected, denied or churned), with the cost per unit attached. 1× is the role's own pre-AI baseline, pre-registered from your history. 10× is a person who has changed the job from doing the work to directing and checking it. See the ladder →
Isn't this just an employee leaderboard?
No, and the method page says so in writing. The person sees their own number first and chooses who else sees it; the company is ranked by department, team and role; individual rankings are off until a written policy turns them on and the people are told; no multiplier rises on work that came back; and every ranking comes with the playbook for the role. Ranked to lift, never to punish. The five rules →
Which roles can be measured?
Any role with a system of record that already says "finished" and already says "it came back": engineering, support, sales, finance and AP, legal, marketing, recruiting, healthcare revenue cycle today; operations, procurement, claims, underwriting and clinical documentation on the same pattern. Roles without such a system are not on the index — we do not estimate.
How is this different from the engineering-metrics tools we already run?
Keep them — we export to them. Those tools count what humans did in Git and correlate it with AI seats, in one department. VibeSense puts engineers and coding agents on one ladder, prices every merged PR all-in, acts on it — and does the same thing in seven other departments on one index the CEO and the CFO both read. The Software Intelligence branch →
How often does the number update?
Every day. Each person's multiplier, quality and next step refresh daily from the systems of record; department heads get movers and holds every Monday; the ranking is live all month and frozen at month-end, when the close is signed by finance. Nothing waits for a quarterly survey.
Do our people have to change how they work, or install anything?
No. Nothing is installed on a laptop and nobody fills in a timesheet or a survey. VibeSense reads the systems that already record finished work and the admin analytics your AI tools already expose. The only thing people see is their own number and their next step — in Slack, Teams or email, where they already are.
We only have one or two of these systems. Does it still work?
Yes — start with the department whose system of record you have. One system that says "finished" and one that says "it came back" is enough for a branch; GitHub + Jira, Zendesk alone, or Salesforce alone each qualify. Departments without a system of record are simply not on the index until they have one; we do not estimate.
Where does the playbook come from?
From your own top decile. We read what the people at the top of each role do differently with AI — what they delegate, how they verify, what they never hand to a model — and turn it into the next three steps for everyone else. Each step is proven on the people who adopt it, with its quality effect measured; any step that hurts quality is withdrawn. The department head approves every version.
Will an auditor accept the number?
The method is agreed and signed before measurement; finished units and quality outcomes are read from your systems of record; baselines are pre-registered from your history; loaded rates come from HR; AI spend reconciles to invoices; the close is maker/checker with a tamper-evident period. No AI model sits in the decision path.
What does VibeSense touch on day one?
Nothing in anyone's way. Day one is read-only: events from your systems of record plus the admin analytics your AI tools already expose. Nothing is installed on a laptop. There is no security review to start, because nothing changes.
Where does our data live?
Metadata only by default — no documents, code, prompts or messages retained. VPC or self-hosted data plane; data residency; signed releases.
What does it cost, in one paragraph?
Index: $15 per person per month, floor $30K a year ◌ — every role with a system of record, the ranking, the person view, the playbooks, the benchmark. Software Intelligence branch: +$25 per engineer and $50 per agent per month. Economics add-on +$40–150K a year. No savings share, no overage, no individual ranking by default. Design partners: pilot at $5K a month, pricing locked for three years, the day-90 bar in writing.
Design partners — start this week, nothing changes until you say so

Start this week. An hour of your time, read-only, and you keep the number either way.

What a design-partner seat gets you
  • The free AI Multiplier X-Ray — every department's multiplier, every person's own number, the seats producing nothing, the 10× people in each role, and a signed cost per unit of work on one department. Yours to keep either way.
  • The enterprise ranking inside 30 days — departments, teams and roles on one ladder with quality beside the multiplier.
  • The first 10× playbook live inside 60 days — read from your own top decile, approved by the department head, rolling out to the rest of the role.
  • The day-90 bar in your contract: a signed number exists and the first department's median is up with quality held — or the pilot fee is waived and we publish why.
  • Design-partner pricing locked for three years + a direct line to the people who built it — you shape the unit library, the ranking policy and the first branches.
Design-partner cohort · capacity-limited on purpose3 of 8 seats open

We onboard one company at a time. Seats are held 7 days pending the scoping call. Five conversations are in progress ◌ — each carries its true stage; nothing reads "signed" unless it is.

Claim your seat · 3 clicks

1 Which department gets the first number?
2 How many people in roles with a system of record?
3 Who holds the seat?

No credit card. No commitment until the pilot agreement. The X-Ray and the method page are yours to keep either way.
The 30 minutes cover three things: which department gets the first number · which systems record its finished work · who on the finance side signs it. No slides.

VibeSense · Design-Partner Seat#SEAT-06
StatusHELD · 7 DAYS
Company—
First department—
People—
Nextscoping call — link by email
CLAIMED

A person sees this the moment it arrives. A confirmation lands in your inbox with the scoping-call link — your seat is held for 7 days.